Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390
72 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
- Renewed by Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SP-590 UZ (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly close but the SP-590 UZ (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-590 UZ was introduced 18 months earlier than the A390 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-590 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SP-590 UZ matches up vs the A390 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-590 UZ & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-590 UZ Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-590 UZ over the Sony A390
| SP-590 UZ | A390 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus SP-590 UZ
| A390 | SP-590 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 18 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SP-590 UZ and Sony A390
| SP-590 UZ | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-590 UZ enjoys exterior measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SP-590 UZ against the A390.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-590 UZ and A390 is 72 and 66 respectively.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-590 UZ and A390.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-590 UZ having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A390 will render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-590 UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus SP-590 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus SP-590 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $500 |