Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31


91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The SP-600 UZ was released 5 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the SP-600 UZ matches up versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1
SP-600 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
WG-M1 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 56 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
SP-600 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SP-600 UZ against the WG-M1.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and WG-M1 is 69 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and WG-M1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | (1×) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $189 | $2,000 |