Clicky

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-600 UZ was released 5 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the SP-600 UZ matches up versus the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1

 SP-600 UZ WG-M1 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display dimensions2.7"1.5"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k115kSharper display (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 WG-M1 SP-600 UZ 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014February 2010Fresher by 56 months

Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1

 SP-600 UZ WG-M1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SP-600 UZ against the WG-M1.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and WG-M1 is 69 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-600 UZ and WG-M1.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ Portrait photography features
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography features
27
manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
29
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
36
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
52
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
max ISO too low (800)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
31
long zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
37
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
environment sealing
better than average battery (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SP-600 UZ
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
51
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
long reach (420mm)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
64
better than average battery (350 per charge)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
29
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
35
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
better than average battery (350 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Vlogging camera
20
relatively wide (28mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
26
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus SP-600 UZRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SP-600 UZ Ricoh WG-M1
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2010-02-02 2014-09-12
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-420mm (15.0x) (1×)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.4 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 1.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 115 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.10 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 455 grams (1.00 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB-65
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $189 $2,000