Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4a1/1a4a1e9ae5851412bf5c0adc402e8817737aa48f" alt="Sony SLT-A35 front Sony SLT-A35 front"
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Sony A35, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SP-600 UZ was introduced 19 months prior to the A35 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SP-600 UZ scores versus the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony SLT-A35. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Sony A35
SP-600 UZ | A35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
A35 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Sony A35
SP-600 UZ | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ provides outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-600 UZ versus Sony A35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the SP-600 UZ vs the A35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a8ea/1a8ea4d3e677e1d486422d3e38beb4d61fcaefa5" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-600 UZ and A35 is 69 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bfee/6bfeec34a3b2678c408ce4d8667528d5618066d5" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The photograph below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-600 UZ and A35.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SP-600 UZ having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A35 will resolve greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/094b8/094b87013e32b090224f03814c44a4a765d71718" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/655e0/655e0092320e88a5722b44361f59ea088896e955" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Sony A35 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Sony SLT-A35 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 415g (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $189 | $598 |