Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2
79 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-616mm (F3.3-5.7) lens
- 405g - 107 x 73 x 73mm
- Launched January 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-600 UZ
- Replacement is Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus SP-610UZ versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the SP-610UZ (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-610UZ was announced 17 months after the CX2 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the SP-610UZ grades versus the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-610UZ and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-610UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-610UZ over the Ricoh CX2
| SP-610UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus SP-610UZ
| CX2 | SP-610UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-610UZ and Ricoh CX2
| SP-610UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-610UZ comes with exterior dimensions of 107mm x 73mm x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-610UZ versus Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-610UZ compared to the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-610UZ and CX2 is 79 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The pic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-610UZ and CX2.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus SP-610UZ to give more detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer SP-610UZ provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-610UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus SP-610UZ | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SP-610UZ | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-06 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-616mm (22.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 405g (0.89 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 73 x 73mm (4.2" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $341 |