Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Announced January 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Announced April 2019
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Panasonic G95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) have different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-620 UZ was released 8 years earlier than the G95 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the SP-620 UZ matches up vs the G95 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Panasonic G95
SP-620 UZ | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
G95 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2019 | January 2012 | Newer by 88 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Panasonic G95
SP-620 UZ | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has got outer measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") having a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-620 UZ versus Panasonic G95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the SP-620 UZ versus the G95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-620 UZ and G95 is 78 and 67 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and G95.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SP-620 UZ because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Panasonic G95 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged SP-620 UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus SP-620 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) | 536 grams (1.18 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $199 | $998 |