Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-620 UZ (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SP-620 UZ was released 2 years after the CX1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the SP-620 UZ grades versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Ricoh CX1
| SP-620 UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
| CX1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX1
| SP-620 UZ | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-620 UZ has outside measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-620 UZ and Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-620 UZ vs the CX1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-620 UZ and CX1 is 78 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-620 UZ and CX1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus SP-620 UZ to result in more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger SP-620 UZ should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-620 UZ vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-620 UZ | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-525mm (21.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.8 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $199 | $299 |
