Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Launched April 2019
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic G95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe SP-800 UZ was announced 10 years earlier than the G95 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SP-800 UZ grades vs the G95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Panasonic G95
SP-800 UZ | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
G95 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2019 | February 2010 | More modern by 111 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic G95
SP-800 UZ | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic G95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SP-800 UZ and the G95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and G95 is 69 and 67 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-800 UZ and G95.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SP-800 UZ using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic G95 will deliver more detail with its extra 6.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20.3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 12s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lb) | 536g (1.18 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $270 | $998 |