Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Released February 2011
- Older Model is Panasonic GF1
- Newer Model is Panasonic GF3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Panasonic GF2, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is fairly similar but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was manufactured 12 months before the GF2 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SP-800 UZ matches up versus the GF2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Panasonic GF2
SP-800 UZ | GF2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
GF2 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Panasonic GF2
SP-800 UZ | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ offers physical dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Panasonic GF2 has measurements of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Panasonic GF2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the GF2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31364/313641bc2d8247b7931046e4c8e0eb0d03eab633" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-800 UZ and GF2 is 69 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d842/2d8428bf8cbed640e7bfb92cf3fb4de727768ffd" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and GF2.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SP-800 UZ because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b24f/8b24f73fb848b57c32fc319b8d0e87489f8ac751" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98b72/98b72b01dc2cb8bb7a33da4650700a7ab8ab2a21" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 12 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 310 grams (0.68 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $270 | $330 |