Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
92 Imaging
33 Features
38 Overall
35
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed November 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and CX6 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 21 months earlier than the CX6 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SP-800 UZ grades vs the CX6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh CX6. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh CX6
| SP-800 UZ | CX6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| CX6 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2011 | February 2010 | Fresher by 21 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh CX6
| SP-800 UZ | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outer measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Ricoh CX6 has specifications of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the CX6.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-800 UZ and CX6 is 69 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and CX6.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-800 UZ to deliver greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh CX6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 12s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $270 | $595 |