Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-800 UZ was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-30 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SP-800 UZ scores versus the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Ricoh WG-30. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Ricoh WG-30
SP-800 UZ | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
WG-30 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | February 2010 | More recent by 57 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Ricoh WG-30
SP-800 UZ | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides physical measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-800 UZ compared to the WG-30.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and WG-30 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and WG-30.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to offer extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-800 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $270 | $428 |