Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony A390, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SP-800 UZ was released 5 months prior to the A390 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the SP-800 UZ scores against the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Sony A390
SP-800 UZ | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
A390 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Sony A390
SP-800 UZ | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2010 | Same generation |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-800 UZ provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony A390 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Sony A390 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-800 UZ versus the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a8c/04a8cad3b4dcba2aa6c53d5dd633acaafaa3de4e" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and A390 is 69 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22556/22556d5f5ccd6f9db1578f5fac2e584f71aed2d2" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-800 UZ and A390.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The SP-800 UZ offers the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c25c/7c25c6f72d3afe7e4b23f0ae1b571b8753068fe3" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb2b/bbb2be9ed5e5b9867333ac180233c13a438b0ca0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 12 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 549g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $270 | $500 |