Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SP-810 UZ versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-810 UZ was unveiled 4 years prior to the Q-S1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the SP-810 UZ matches up vs the Q-S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-810 UZ & Pentax Q-S1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Pentax Q-S1
SP-810 UZ | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
Q-S1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Pentax Q-S1
SP-810 UZ | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-810 UZ has got outside dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-810 UZ versus Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SP-810 UZ versus the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d63a3/d63a337cb6b51a12895d554165abe5f54e0e6091" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SP-810 UZ and Q-S1 is 78 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/080fb/080fb7f97889aae3cdf2068e3156e21528d10db8" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-810 UZ and Q-S1.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SP-810 UZ using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged SP-810 UZ is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8523c/8523c652a5a3a28012311bb1be8565ad2acb70a9" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ee/994ee469c5b6c235a4e15294bc210d854dd65132" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus SP-810 UZ | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1200 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 0.7fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.20 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $250 |