Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-810 UZ was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SP-810 UZ scores against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-810 UZ & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1
SP-810 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
WG-M1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 38 months |
Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
SP-810 UZ | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-810 UZ has got outside dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-810 UZ and the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-810 UZ and WG-M1 is 78 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-810 UZ and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images although you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older SP-810 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Olympus SP-810 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SP-810 UZ | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-07-27 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-864mm (36.0x) | (1×) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 0.7 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $280 | $2,000 |