Clicky

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Photography Glossary

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SP-810 UZ was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SP-810 UZ scores against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Ricoh WG-M1

 SP-810 UZ WG-M1 
Display size3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 WG-M1 SP-810 UZ 
IntroducedSeptember 2014July 2011Fresher by 38 months

Common features in the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1

 SP-810 UZ WG-M1 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-810 UZ has got outside dimensions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SP-810 UZ and the WG-M1.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-810 UZ and WG-M1 is 78 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-810 UZ and WG-M1.

As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP therefore you can expect similar quality of images although you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older SP-810 UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
30
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Street photography camera
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
53
environment proof
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low max ISO (800)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography details
40
long zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200s)
very slow continuous shooting (0.7 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
38
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment proof
great battery (350 per charge)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography details
61
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (864mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
64
great battery (350 per charge)
environment proof
decent megapixels (14MP)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus SP-810 UZ
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-M1
40
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
35
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
environment proof
great battery (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging information
27
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic socket
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
missing external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SP-810 UZ vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-810 UZ and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus SP-810 UZRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SP-810 UZ Ricoh WG-M1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2011-07-27 2014-09-12
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 3200 800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-864mm (36.0x) (1×)
Highest aperture f/2.9-5.7 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 1.5"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 115 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs -
Maximum shutter speed 1/1200 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 0.7 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.20 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 413g (0.91 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B DB-65
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $280 $2,000