Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SZ-10 was introduced 15 months prior to the TG-1 iHS which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SZ-10 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-10 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SZ-10 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus SZ-10
| TG-1 iHS | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 15 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SZ-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-10 comes with physical dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-10 versus the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-10 and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus SZ-10 to provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SZ-10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $399 |