Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SZ-10 (14MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-10 was introduced 15 months prior to the TG-1 iHS which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SZ-10 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-10 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SZ-10 | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus SZ-10
| TG-1 iHS | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 15 months | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 460k | Sharper screen (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| SZ-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-10 comes with physical dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-10 versus the TG-1 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-10 and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-10 and TG-1 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus SZ-10 to provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SZ-10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SZ-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $300 | $399 |