Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus SZ-10 versus Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the SZ-10 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SZ-10 was manufactured 11 months before the TX200V so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SZ-10 grades against the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SZ-10 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Sony TX200V
| SZ-10 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus SZ-10
| TX200V | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2011 | More recent by 11 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-10 and Sony TX200V
| SZ-10 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-10 offers physical dimensions of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SZ-10 versus Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the SZ-10 vs the TX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-10 and TX200V is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-10 and TX200V.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX200V to give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older SZ-10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus SZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus SZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-4.4 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.10 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $500 |
