Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
67 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh GR III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the SZ-12 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SZ-12 was announced 7 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SZ-12 grades vs the GR III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GR III
| SZ-12 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus SZ-12
| GR III | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | January 2012 | Newer by 81 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR III
| SZ-12 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-12 offers outside measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh GR III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SZ-12 against the GR III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and GR III is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-12 and GR III.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SZ-12 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Ricoh GR III will show extra detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SZ-12 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR III |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2018-09-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus range | - | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $900 |