Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310
88 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de070/de070c57f70c18cca33e66ee5f72e095cd443e26" alt="Olympus SZ-15 front Olympus SZ-15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus SZ-15 and Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The resolution of the SZ-15 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SZ-15 was revealed 2 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the SZ-15 grades versus the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-15 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-15 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-15 over the Olympus TG-310
SZ-15 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus SZ-15
TG-310 | SZ-15 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-15 and Olympus TG-310
SZ-15 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-15 comes with physical dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-15 and Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the SZ-15 against the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c85c9/c85c92aee77677a51af4bb3f338c6276097054f2" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-15 and TG-310 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77a29/77a294a85afe0885581d5d7745eea3c02be3bc3c" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-15 and TG-310.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SZ-15 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher SZ-15 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07ebd/07ebd2a27628b4b8862a2a5e56964d27d3d8cb6f" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2baef/2baefbf08d245e5d7ed499772bca8e46f0fd167d" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus SZ-15 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SZ-15 | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | AVI MPEG4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $200 | $0 |