Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SZ-16 iHS was unveiled 18 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SZ-16 iHS scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| SZ-16 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | July 2011 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| VR-320 | SZ-16 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| SZ-16 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the VR-320.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and VR-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher SZ-16 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $230 | $179 |