Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was unveiled 18 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SZ-16 iHS scores versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
SZ-16 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 18 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
VR-320 | SZ-16 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus VR-320
SZ-16 iHS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e762b/e762be7cce24b7dff5129d54fdecabb6a6d52716" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and VR-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55b61/55b61cc43a864cddc8af114cb7afd77e4e76c02a" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to produce more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher SZ-16 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31d2d/31d2ddb4a12fa401f401db9bc68670d961f9100a" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81019/8101940560013d9878bd1f3142dc67b98bc80c48" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $230 | $179 |