Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SZ-16 iHS was released 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the SZ-16 iHS scores against the CX4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
| SZ-16 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | August 2010 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| CX4 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh CX4
| SZ-16 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has got external measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SZ-16 iHS vs the CX4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and CX4 is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-16 iHS and CX4.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher SZ-16 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $230 | $211 |