Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB600
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SZ-16 iHS was announced 3 years after the HZ30W which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SZ-16 iHS matches up vs the HZ30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ30W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Samsung HZ30W
| SZ-16 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| HZ30W | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ30W
| SZ-16 iHS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS features outer dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the HZ30W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and HZ30W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and HZ30W.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The younger SZ-16 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also Known as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $230 | $280 |
