Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de65b/de65bfe186e39934ff695656a2380e8b4549eaed" alt="Samsung NX3000 front Samsung NX3000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was manufactured 16 months prior to the NX3000 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the SZ-16 iHS scores versus the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung NX3000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Samsung NX3000
SZ-16 iHS | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
NX3000 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 16 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung NX3000
SZ-16 iHS | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the NX3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1b4f/e1b4f9ccd02fd2d5733295237aff69bfa996a5eb" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and NX3000 is 89 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d316/8d3164885067b1fdbc6e07cbe5ac303cdcdca44c" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and NX3000.
All in all, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SZ-16 iHS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung NX3000 will show greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-16 iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1936/e193611f10fda98d9432d36e3192f3b887f50e16" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aed25/aed25cea0a651767aad4fb52bb39acc9ea7b3f4f" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung NX3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 370 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $230 | $897 |