Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75
89 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed March 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SZ-30MR (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SZ-30MR was manufactured 10 months after the FX75 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SZ-30MR matches up against the FX75 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-30MR & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Panasonic FX75
| SZ-30MR | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2011 | June 2010 | Newer by 10 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SZ-30MR
| FX75 | SZ-30MR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-30MR and Panasonic FX75
| SZ-30MR | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-30MR has physical measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-30MR against the FX75.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-30MR and FX75 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-30MR and FX75.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SZ-30MR to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern SZ-30MR will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-30MR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus SZ-30MR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-03-02 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $279 | $139 |