Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8a9/2d8a95487a0964a4254d1d693e044bf6a741f7bd" alt="Olympus VG-120 front Olympus VG-120 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus VG-120 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VG-120 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly similar but the VG-120 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VG-120 was unveiled 23 months before the XZ-2 iHS making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-120 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VG-120 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-120 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-120 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-120 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VG-120
XZ-2 iHS | VG-120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 23 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-120 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VG-120 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-120 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-120 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the VG-120 against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09779/0977984c774d5173704d6ee920c4e982806ef01c" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-120 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36758/367581d00453ba6efba5b5d3ffcb7262be69ccd8" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The picture here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-120 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VG-120 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VG-120 will deliver more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged VG-120 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbac1/dbac123e24cce7c9a172a92c50d570e1514186e1" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/581f7/581f7c182f6fb35806cfea773ffd482388645210" alt="Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus VG-120 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus VG-120 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $190 | $450 |