Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
89 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
89 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
Portability
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2012
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-31MR iHS (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe SZ-31MR iHS was brought out 3 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SZ-31MR iHS scores versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-31MR iHS & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-31MR iHS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SZ-31MR iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
| WG-M1 | SZ-31MR iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SZ-31MR iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-31MR iHS offers outer measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SZ-31MR iHS vs the WG-M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-31MR iHS and WG-M1 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-31MR iHS and WG-M1.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS to give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older SZ-31MR iHS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
megapixel count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides touch focus
lighter than competitors (226 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
environment proof
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
max ISO too low (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery power (200 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery life (350 shots)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Travel photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography highlights
lighter than competitors (226g)
provides touch focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (200 per charge)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
environment proof
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery power (200 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count good (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (1.5 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging details
decently wide (25mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (226g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Hypercrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 350 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $2,000 |