Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the 5010 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 5010 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the TG-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 5010 matches up versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 5010 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 5010 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus TG-320
| 5010 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus 5010
| TG-320 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Olympus TG-320
| 5010 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 5010 features outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the 5010 vs the TG-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 5010 and TG-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 5010 and TG-320.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged 5010 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 5010 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 5010 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Other name | mju 5010 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $150 | $0 |