Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 550WP (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 550WP was manufactured 4 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the 550WP scores vs the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 550WP and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 550WP Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| 550WP | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus 550WP
| TG-820 iHS | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| 550WP | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 550WP has outer measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the 550WP compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and TG-820 iHS is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 550WP and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-820 iHS to give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older 550WP is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Also referred to as | mju 550WP | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $500 |