Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RZ18, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and RZ18 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 550WP was unveiled 3 years before the RZ18 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 550WP matches up versus the RZ18 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Pentax Optio RZ18. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Pentax RZ18
550WP | RZ18 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus 550WP
RZ18 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RZ18
550WP | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 550WP enjoys physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Pentax RZ18 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RZ18 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 550WP vs the RZ18.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 550WP and RZ18 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 550WP and RZ18.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Pentax RZ18 to give extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older 550WP is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Also called | mju 550WP | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 178 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $399 | $210 |