Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh CX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 550WP (10MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 550WP was unveiled 3 years earlier than the CX5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 550WP matches up against the CX5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Ricoh CX5
| 550WP | CX5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus 550WP
| CX5 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh CX5
| 550WP | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 550WP features outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the 550WP versus the CX5.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and CX5 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 550WP and CX5.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged 550WP is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Ricoh CX5 |
| Also called | mju 550WP | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $399 |