Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 550WP was revealed 6 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the 550WP matches up vs the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Ricoh WG-M1
| 550WP | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus 550WP
| WG-M1 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh WG-M1
| 550WP | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 550WP provides outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 550WP and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 550WP compared to the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged 550WP will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 550WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 550WP | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $399 | $2,000 |