Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 7000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus 7000 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 7000 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 7000 was brought out 6 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 7000 scores versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 7000 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 7000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| 7000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus 7000
| WG-M1 | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 69 months |
Common features in the Olympus 7000 and Ricoh WG-M1
| 7000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 7000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 7000 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the 7000 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 7000 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7000 and WG-M1.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged 7000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7000 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7000 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also referred to as | mju 7000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-260mm (7.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 172g (0.38 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $280 | $2,000 |