Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320
94 Imaging
35 Features
18 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus 7010 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the 7010 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 7010 was released 3 years earlier than the TG-320 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the 7010 matches up against the TG-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7010 and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 7010 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Olympus TG-320
| 7010 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus 7010
| TG-320 | 7010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus 7010 and Olympus TG-320
| 7010 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 7010 enjoys outside measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 7010 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 7010 vs the TG-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 7010 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 7010 and TG-320.
As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older 7010 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 7010 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7010 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | mju 7010 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 145 grams (0.32 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $200 | $0 |