Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18
94 Imaging
35 Features
18 Overall
28
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus 7010 versus Pentax RZ18, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the 7010 (12MP) and RZ18 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 7010 was launched 3 years prior to the RZ18 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the 7010 scores versus the RZ18 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 7010 & Pentax Optio RZ18. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 7010 Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Pentax RZ18
7010 | RZ18 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus 7010
RZ18 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 26 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7010 and Pentax RZ18
7010 | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 7010 features outside dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Pentax RZ18 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 7010 versus Pentax RZ18 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 7010 against the RZ18.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 7010 and RZ18 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 7010 and RZ18.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax RZ18 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged 7010 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 7010 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7010 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus 7010 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Also Known as | mju 7010 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2011-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 145g (0.32 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $200 | $210 |