Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus 7030 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 7030 was released 5 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 7030 matches up vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 7030 and Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 7030 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Samsung WB350F
| 7030 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus 7030
| WB350F | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Samsung WB350F
| 7030 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 7030 has got exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus 7030 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the 7030 and the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 7030 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 7030 and WB350F.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 7030 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung WB350F |
| Also referred to as | mju 7030 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $179 | $260 |
