Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the 7040 (14MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 7040 was brought out 6 years before the TG-4 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the 7040 scores against the TG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 7040 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 7040 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Olympus TG-4
| 7040 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus 7040
| TG-4 | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 64 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-4
| 7040 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 7040 has exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 7040 and Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the 7040 and the TG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 7040 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 7040 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-4 to give extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged 7040 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 7040 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7040 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Other name | mju 7040 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 144 gr (0.32 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $299 | $379 |
