Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce2e/7ce2ede9fa2768a825fe05b5a60a4314f7a7f1a8" alt="Samsung TL205 front Samsung TL205 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL205, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the GR (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) and the GR (APS-C) and TL205 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The GR was launched 3 years after the TL205 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL205 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GR matches up vs the TL205 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR and Samsung TL205. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Samsung TL205
GR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Ricoh GR
TL205 | GR |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL205
GR | TL205 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR enjoys external measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung TL205 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR and Samsung TL205 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GR versus the TL205.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9b88/e9b88a06e79778ab8b837e6bca1863126866cb29" alt="Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 size comparison Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR and TL205 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48eee/48eee401cb4ea629dd0d8c6873351c9106476a94" alt="Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The pic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR and TL205.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR will show more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern GR is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6365/b6365ee9623d269480c656a9f873284bdc47f2ba" alt="Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c11e7/c11e7b5da7ba7c12839029437b9a9ffc3843d479" alt="Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh GR vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
Ricoh GR | Samsung TL205 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR | Samsung TL205 |
Alternate name | - | PL100 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-04-17 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 177 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 78 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 972 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $971 | $180 |