Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju 7040
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the 7040 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 7040 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 7040 was launched 7 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 7040 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 7040 scores against the FZ2500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7040 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 7040 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Panasonic FZ2500
7040 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 7040
FZ2500 | 7040 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | January 2010 | More recent by 81 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 7040 and Panasonic FZ2500
7040 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 7040 has outside dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 7040 vs the FZ2500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 7040 and FZ2500 is 95 and 53 respectively.
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 7040 and FZ2500.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 7040 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older 7040 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 7040 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 7040 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 7040 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | mju 7040 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.70 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 144 grams (0.32 pounds) | 915 grams (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $299 | $998 |