Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 9000 was launched 20 months earlier than the TG-610 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 9000 scores versus the TG-610 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus TG-610. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-610
| 9000 | TG-610 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus 9000
| TG-610 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 20 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-610
| 9000 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 features physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the 9000 vs the TG-610.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and TG-610 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and TG-610.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-610 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $223 |
