Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was released 4 years prior to the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 9000 scores against the TG-630 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| 9000 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus 9000
| TG-630 iHS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| 9000 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the 9000 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and TG-630 iHS is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus 9000 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-630 iHS Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
environment proofing
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (225g)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
environment proofing
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-630 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
rather wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-630 iHS Vlogging highlights
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Also called | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $200 |