Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 9000 was announced 3 years earlier than the VG-160 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 9000 scores versus the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus VG-160
| 9000 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus 9000
| VG-160 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Olympus VG-160
| 9000 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 features external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and VG-160.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to result in extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 9000 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $300 | $90 |
