Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Later Model is Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is very comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was launched 2 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the 9000 grades vs the GX-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung GX-10
| 9000 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 | September 2006 | More recent by 33 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus 9000
| GX-10 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung GX-10
| 9000 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 and the GX-10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and GX-10 is 92 and 59 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and GX-10.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 9000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus 9000 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern 9000 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $850 |