Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 9000 and Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was launched 4 years prior to the ST150F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 9000 matches up against the ST150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung ST150F
| 9000 | ST150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus 9000
| ST150F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | May 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung ST150F
| 9000 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung ST150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the 9000 and the ST150F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and ST150F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specs. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and ST150F.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung ST150F to render more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung ST150F |
| Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 114 grams (0.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $300 |