Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VR-340, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-6 was released 7 years later than the VR-340 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-6 grades against the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus VR-340
| TG-6 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2019 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 90 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus TG-6
| VR-340 | TG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VR-340
| TG-6 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-6 has got outer measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-6 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-6 versus the VR-340.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and VR-340 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and VR-340.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-6 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-6 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2019-05-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $449 | $130 |