Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus 9000 and Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is very well matched but the 9000 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.

The 9000 was launched 14 months prior to the TL500 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 9000 grades vs the TL500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung TL500
9000 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus 9000
TL500 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung TL500
9000 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 and Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the 9000 and the TL500.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and TL500 is 92 and 88 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and TL500.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus 9000 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung TL500 |
Alternative name | mju 9000 | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 386 grams (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $527 |