Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB350F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 9000 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 grades versus the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB350F

 9000 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus 9000

 WB350F 9000 
LaunchedJanuary 2014May 2009Fresher by 56 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB350F

 9000 WB350F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 against the WB350F.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and WB350F.

Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography factors
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
40
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average in class (225g)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (276g)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
50
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Travel photography highlights
58
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than others (276g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography factors
32
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
50
manual focus
quite wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging information
Samsung WB350F Vlogging information
27
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
34
quite wide (23mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (276 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus Stylus 9000Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Samsung WB350F
Other name mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-05-14 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 pounds) 276 gr (0.61 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $300 $260