Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB350F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The 9000 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB350F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 9000 grades versus the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB350F
9000 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus 9000
WB350F | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB350F
9000 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 against the WB350F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and WB350F.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB350F |
Other name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $260 |