Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was revealed 5 years prior to the WB50F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the 9000 grades versus the WB50F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB50F
| 9000 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus 9000
| WB50F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB50F
| 9000 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the 9000 against the WB50F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and WB50F.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB50F to offer extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB50F |
| Also called | mju 9000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $180 |
