Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The 9000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the HX300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the 9000 grades vs the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony HX300

 9000 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus 9000

 HX300 9000 
AnnouncedFebruary 2013May 2009More recent by 45 months
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kCrisper screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300

 9000 HX300 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the 9000 and the HX300.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and HX300.

Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony HX300 to give more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography factors
Sony HX300 Portrait photography factors
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
42
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Street photography camera
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
50
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than average (623 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography information
Sony HX300 Sports photography information
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
provides tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography info
Sony HX300 Travel photography info
58
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (225g)
low resolution (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
54
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (623g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Landscape photography camera
32
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
48
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Sony HX300
27
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone support
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
25
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than average (623 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Alternative name mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-05-14 2013-02-20
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 grams (0.50 pounds) 623 grams (1.37 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $300 $339