Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the HX300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the 9000 grades vs the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony HX300
9000 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus 9000
HX300 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | May 2009 | More recent by 45 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300
9000 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the 9000 and the HX300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and HX300.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony HX300 to give more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Alternative name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 623 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $339 |