Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR II versus Sony T900, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR II was introduced 6 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GR II scores vs the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony T900
GR II | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 78 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 922k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GR II
T900 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony T900
GR II | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II enjoys outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GR II compared to the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and T900 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and T900.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR II will give more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher GR II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-06-17 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $300 |