Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a332/2a332414d1141ffe894b090011e2d9165f883dd3" alt="Sony SLT-A68 front Sony SLT-A68 front"
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Old Model is Sony A65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A68, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and A68 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The 9000 was unveiled 7 years prior to the A68 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 9000 scores vs the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony SLT-A68. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A68
9000 | A68 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Olympus 9000
A68 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2015 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 78 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A68
9000 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A68 has sizing of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A68 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 vs the A68.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36774/36774e5ac613398e761a015afc8483f71aeedfbe" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and A68 is 92 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d032/3d032de4461026aa017f0905cbb33d82f6ba7338" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and A68.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 9000 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A68 will give extra detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54d57/54d5730880afd9f848956de02a9cc28e111675b9" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93ed8/93ed803b4ef53e985b4ed9fa3597b86c0c910e5b" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2015-11-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 79 |
Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 610 gr (1.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 510 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $300 | $581 |