Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
67 Imaging
77 Features
62 Overall
71
Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Announced September 2018
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 9000 versus Zeiss ZX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Zeiss. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and ZX1 (Full frame) provide totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was manufactured 10 years earlier than the ZX1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 9000 scores versus the ZX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Zeiss ZX1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Zeiss ZX1
| 9000 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus 9000
| ZX1 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 114 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 4.34" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+1.64") |
| Screen resolution | 2765k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+2535k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Zeiss ZX1
| 9000 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 offers external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") having a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 versus Zeiss ZX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 and the ZX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and ZX1 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and ZX1.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 9000 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Zeiss ZX1 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 25MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 9000 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Zeiss |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2018-09-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 37 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 255 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2-22 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 4.34 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 2,765k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 800 gr (1.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | 512GB internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | - |