Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Old Model is Olympus SH-1
- Renewed by Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was announced 3 years later than the VG-160 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the SH-2 matches up versus the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus VG-160
| SH-2 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 39 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus SH-2
| VG-160 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Olympus VG-160
| SH-2 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 features external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 vs the VG-160.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and VG-160 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-2 and VG-160.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SH-2 to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher SH-2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-2 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 165 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $399 | $90 |